The Doctor (Tennant) and Rose (Piper) travel back to the year 1879. An encounter in the Scottish Highlands with Queen Victoria and a band of warrior monks reveals a deadly trap, dating back centuries. Can the local legends of a werewolf really be true?
Hi, I'm 13 and i disagree, i did like the old Doctor Who's but i preffer the newer ones, i understand them better and i personaly think it doesn't have more or less action, just a different type
I second that, keep it simple. You cannot improve on Davies' ideas and format. David Tennant makes a great Doctor, a very refreshingly modern twist on the old typecast role. But I'm still not too sure how much more of Catherine Tate I can tolerate.
June 21st - 8:38pmLawrence said...
I agree with Russ. The KISS principle has been abandoned, leading to complicated, bizaar story lines. No comparisonm with the really good lines of the original series, and those that followed.
June 21st - 7:30pmgabi said...
OMG!!!!
a very very very good cliffhanger this week!
it had me right on the edge of my seat
:D
June 20th - 4:44pmPaul Dawson said...
The viewing and appreciation figures would very much suggest otherwise. Kids can be clever, and adults like a laugh sometimes. I'm still watching with my children, and we're loving it to pieces.
Having praised the return of Dr Who as some of the best TV the BBC have produced in years I find myself disapointed overhaul with the 2008 series. Too complicated for the younger audience, too silly for the older audience. Get back to Mr Davies's original ideas and keep it good old fashioned hide behind the sofa material or it will dwindle into obscurity over the next year or so...
(3 Star)
Add a comment